Seeking answers on BC social care wage inequality

Seeking answers on BC social care wage inequality


Mr. Speaker: Member for Saanich North and the Islands. A. Olsen: Question period has been a mess
this week. The official opposition has been asking important
questions but, unfortunately, conflating two issues. The responses have been tragic, and the ministers
are falling back on the “16 years” narrative, which is getting pretty tired. So let me try. A number of weeks ago my colleague from Oak
Bay–Gordon Head raised an important question about how the procurement process had changed
at Work B.C. We were worried about the impact that it could
be having on the non-profits doing excellent work in our province. We now have learned that two multinational
corporations took 22 percent of the money for Work B.C. employment training contracts. That does not seem to fit the “balance” the
minister said he’d found. The issue is the open procurement method,
treating companies and non-profits exactly the same despite the vast differences in how
they operate and their connection to the local community. The official opposition has been raising legitimate
questions these past few days on how our community social service sector feels under attack by
a series of changes that this government has introduced. My question is to the Minister of Social Services
and Poverty Reduction, and I’m taking this directly from a recent quote from the executive
director of Board Voice. Do we have any proof that an open procurement
method is the best way to select vital social care services to our citizens? Hon. S. Simpson: Thank you to the member for the
question. The procurement process…. Let me first step back and talk a bit about
Work B.C., and then I’ll respond to the question — the procurement piece. We know that what’s been going on in the province…. We’ve had the lowest unemployment rates in
British Columbia for 19 months, the lowest rates across the country. Interjections. Mr. Speaker: Members. Minister, we’ll try this once more. Hon. S. Simpson: The challenge with this, though,
is that while lots of people, the majority of people, in the province have benefited,
there are groups who have not realized that benefit — persons with disabilities, Indigenous
people, single moms escaping violence and others. So we’ve restructured the Work B.C. program
to more clearly focus on supports over the coming years with those folks. The new process, which came into place April
1…. We’re working closely with the providers to
make sure we have a smooth implementation. In regard to the specific question about the
non-profits and what that balance looks like, under the previous program cycle, which ended
on March 31, 49 percent of all the contract dollars went to non-profits, and 49 percent
of all the contract dollars went to for-profit organizations. Under the new model, 57 percent of all the
dollars are going to non-profits, 39 percent to for-profit organizations, and 4 percent
are going to a public institution that’s providing support. In addition to those primary contractors,
there are 130 subcontractors, and 71 percent of those are non-profits, which is an 11 percent
increase under the past model. Mr. Speaker: Saanich North and the Islands
on a supplemental. A. Olsen: I’ll go back and review later, to
see if that was actually an answer, but nonetheless…. Now, let me pivot to another troubling issue
regarding our social service sector, the other part of the issues that were being conflated
this week. On one hand, it seems that global corporations,
rather than local non-profits, are starting to take over more of the social care of B.C. On the other hand, it seems that the government
is indeed favouring unionized workplaces with their low-wage redress agreement. I realize that this was a negotiated agreement
between unions and health care providers, but there is a legitimate question on how
this may impact the non-unionized non-profit organizations. I have family members that have talked to
me about this directly — on how it’s impacting them. We know it’s the case. Non-profits already struggling are being hit
twice in this province. They’re competing against big multinationals
and they are also potentially facing disruptive wage discrepancies that are likely to increase
turnover and workplace tension. It is happening. I want an answer here that doesn’t pivot to
the last 16 years. I want the Minister of Social Development
to please explain why the $40 million low-wage redress agreement couldn’t also be applied
to non-unionized non-profits? Mr. Speaker: Minister of Social Development and Poverty Reduction Strategy. S. Simpson: Thanks to the member again. The member may want to disconnect the history
of the relationship of social service delivery in this province from what happens today. We can’t do that. The reality is that we have seen a sector
that has been under assault for an awfully long time. It’s
a sector that we are working closely with to build a future here, looking forward, a
sector where we start to build the framework around how we deliver services to people in
a whole array of areas, including around Community Living B.C. and in those initiatives. We’re working with Board Voice. We’re working with the Federation of Community
Social Services. We’re working with the CEO Network and a whole
array of other groups to do that moving forward. It’s a work-in-progress. I’m very confident that the system is getting
stronger and that we are going to deliver the best, most effective social service programs
that this province has ever seen. We will overcome 16 years of debacle.

Author: Kennedi Daugherty

1 thought on “Seeking answers on BC social care wage inequality

  1. Hi Friend ,
    Professional Liability Insurance from the best Company in Canada that can protect you, your reputation and your livelihood .
    For The Best Professional Liability Insurance – https://www.easycover.ca
    One of the largest independent brokerages in Canada .
    #ProfessionalLiabilityInsurance
    #LiabilityInsuranceCanada

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *