Organizations and bureaucratization | Individuals and Society | MCAT | Khan Academy

Organizations and bureaucratization | Individuals and Society | MCAT | Khan Academy


– Although we might not realize it organizations and bureaucracies play an increasingly
large role in our lives. When social scientists
talk about organizations, they are talking about institutions that are designed for a specific purpose. They have a collective goal and they are often set up to achieve or to try to achieve maximum efficiency. The U.S. Postar Service delivers our mail, McDonald’s gives us fast food, the same fast food
wherever we might travel, and Time Warner Cable delivers
TV and internet access. There are three main
types of organizations: utilitarian organizations, normative organizations and coercive organizations. In utilitarian organizations members are paid for their efforts. This includes things like
businesses and government jobs, but it also includes universities. You might not get paid to attend, but you do receive a diploma
in exchange for your time. In normative organizations members come together
through shared goals. This will include things
like religious groups or groups like MADD, Mothers Against Drunk Driving. Because shared goals are really the focus
of these organizations, they’re typically characterized by a positive sense of unity and purpose. Coercive organizations are
organizations where the members really don’t have that much
a choice about membership. This can include individuals in a prison who don’t really have the
opportunity to simply leave, but it could also include
organizations like the military. You might enter voluntarily
or you could be drafted, but you need to be
discharged in order to leave. Coercive organizations are
often highly structured and they have very strict rules. One of the main goals of organizations is they try to achieve maximum efficiency and they do this through bureaucracy. This is the term that sociologists use to describe the rule,
structure and the ranking that guides organizations. This is somewhat different from the way that we talk about
bureaucracy in everyday life where it often has a really
negative connotation. For example, when i think about the word bureaucracy I usually think about long
lines and piles of paperwork with complicated language
and lots of red tape. When social scientists
talk about bureaucracy, they’re talking about the
structure of the organizations that keeps them running day to day. That said, we also use the term bureaucratization to describe the process
by which an organization becomes increasingly
governed by law and policy. I think the best example of this is how customer service has changed. I’m old enough to remember just being transferred to a single person when I called customer service, but now I have the experience and maybe you have it too, of being moved through
12 different menu options before I find what I need or being passed around
from person to person as they try to figure out who can help you with your problem. This also relates to what is referred to as the Iron Rule of Oligarchy, which describes how even the most democratic of organizations tend to become more bureaucratic overtime until eventually they are
governed by just a select few. Why would this happen? Well, conflict theorists would point out that once a person gains a leadership role in an organization, they might often be
hesitant to give it up, so they would have a vested
interest in clinging to power. It’s also possible that
people who achieve power often have certain skills or knowledge that might make them
really valuable leaders. Another process that
influences organizations is McDonaldization, which describes how the policies
of fast food organizations have come to dominate other organizations within American society. Specifically, we’re talking about the principles of efficiency, calculability, predictability and control. These principles have come to
dominate really everything.>From medicine to education, even sporting events and entertainment. Think about movie theaters. Movie theaters have become increasingly similar to one another, especially in terms of seating and number of theaters and how their concession
stands are set up. You used to have to show up at a theater in order to buy tickets, but now you can do so over
the phone and even online using the exact same ticket systems for basically all theaters. Concession stands don’t just look the same from theater to theater, they also carry the exact same brands. They all generally show
the same popular movies and have the same pre-show entertainment in the form of quizzes or movie facts or commercials for other films. I don’t necessarily mean to imply that any of these is a bad thing because I don’t necessarily
believe that that’s the case. I think that just like everything else, this has both positive and
negative aspects to it. However you decide to
view McDonaldization, the important thing is
to know that it exists and to be able to recognize
it in the society.

Author: Kennedi Daugherty

3 thoughts on “Organizations and bureaucratization | Individuals and Society | MCAT | Khan Academy

  1. Departmentalization is the cornerstone of sovietism which is the most recognized face of communism. That is why it is so difficult to explain what the difference is between capitalism and communism. But you have micro labeled departmentalism in this explanation into sub categories. See prabhat ranjan sarkars law of social cycles for department labels.

  2. Hey @khanacademymedicine ! Whoever is presenting this tutorial is very racist. Here in this video for example, talking about Normative Organizations she only puts Christianity and Judaism signs and exclude Islamic sign. I am curious what is her reason for only put these two religious signs up there and exclude the most populated religion?! There are multiple other incidences throughout her MCAT videos; so this is not the only incident that sparked me taking time out and write about it! I'm very disappointed with Khan Academy for not catching this before uploading! We have to object that you "might" pay attention.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *